ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Olfactory decline in aging: longitudinal trajectories and associations with cognitive decline and postmortem neuropathology.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Decline in olfactory function may be used as a predictor of cognitive decline, to enhance early detection models, improve risk stratification, and enable early intervention. Objective: To assess the longitudinal association between olfactory decline, cognitive decline, and postmortem neuropathology. Design setting and participants: Retrospective longitudinal analysis with clinicopathological correlations of a prospective population-based cohort study using data from the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (AZSAND) and its Brain and Body Donation Program. Participants included cognitively unimpaired individuals without parkinsonism that converted to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or dementia or remained cognitively stable. Main Outcomes and Measures: longitudinal change in olfaction, neuropsychiatric symptoms, motor function and memory, conversion to MCI/dementia, postmortem neuropathology. Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 7.7 ± 5.4 years, out of 922 participants who were cognitively unimpaired at the first cognitive conference, 643 remained cognitively unimpaired, 279 converted to MCI, and 82 developed dementia. Of these, 633 individuals had at least 2 olfactory tests.Converters showed reduced olfactory function (t=-12.6, p <0.0001), faster progression in neuropsychiatric symptom burden (t=3.42, p < 0.001), and faster decline in memory (t= -7.33, p <0.0001) prior to conversion while no significant differences were observed in motor scores between converters and non-converters. Using ROC analysis, olfactory decline, increased neuropsychiatric symptom burden, as well as motor and memory decline predicted conversion to MCI with a consistent accuracy of ~ 70% up to 5 years before conversion, while UPSIT alone had an accuracy of ~ 60%. Longitudinal decline in olfaction was associated with a higher burden of a-synuclein (t= -8.21, p <0.0005), tau tangle (t= -2.66, p < 0.01) and amyloid plaque burden (t= -2.85, p < 0.005) and a faster decline over time was associated with a higher burden of tau (t=5.66, p<0.0001). Conclusions and Relevance: A reduction in olfactory identification ability is observed up to a decade prior to conversion to MCI and is associated with underlying burden of neuropathology markers, underscoring the value of incorporating olfactory testing in cognitively unimpaired individuals to identify those at-risk of future cognitive decline.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.