ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2026
Advancements in pacing and ICD technologies: Potential implications for complex congenital heart disease in adults.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) represent a rapidly growing population with a high burden of bradyarrhythmias and ventricular arrhythmias requiring cardiac implantable electronic devices. However, conventional transvenous pacing and defibrillator systems often present important challenges in this population due to complex anatomy, limited venous access, intracardiac shunts, and the cumulative risk of lead-related complications over a patient's lifetime. Recent technological advances-including conduction system pacing, leadless pacemakers, subcutaneous and extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and emerging modular pacing-defibrillator platforms-have expanded the range of device strategies available for ACHD patients. These innovations aim to reduce intravascular hardware, improve physiological ventricular activation, and enable device therapies tailored to complex congenital anatomy. However, the evidence supporting both conventional and emerging technologies in ACHD patients remains limited and is derived largely from small observational studies and registry data. In addition, the substantial heterogeneity of congenital heart diseases and their prior surgical repair complicates extrapolation of outcomes across patient subgroups. Careful patient selection, anatomical assessment, and consideration of long-term device management therefore remain central to clinical decision-making. In this narrative review, we summarise recent developments in pacing and defibrillator technologies and discuss their potential implications for adults with congenital heart disease. To support clinical decision-making, we also propose a pragmatic ACHD-specific device-selection algorithm integrating anatomical, electrophysiological, and long-term management considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.