Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42094076›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

A unique neural signature of long-term memory encoding from EEG inter-electrode correlation.

Chong Zhao, Edward K Vogel, Monica D Rosenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chong ZhaoDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2356-5528
Edward K VogelDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Monica D RosenbergDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classic memory models proposed that the encoding process involved in visual working memory (VWM) controls the bandwidth of encoding in long-term memory (LTM). Behaviorally, VWM and LTM accuracies are reliably correlated at the behavioral level, raising the question of whether LTM encoding uniquely engages processes that are distinct from VWM encoding. To investigate this, we recorded EEG activity as participants completed recognition memory tasks with set sizes of 32 and 128, far beyond typical VWM capacity. Using interelectrode correlation (IC) analysis, we found that IC patterns reliably predicted individual differences in LTM encoding across both set sizes, indicating a robust, domain-general neural signature. Importantly, this predictive power remained even after controlling for VWM and attentional control performance, suggesting that the model captures variance specific to LTM encoding. Temporally, predictive signals emerged only after stimulus onset and persisted for 500-600 ms. Early and late encoding phases involved distinct network structures, reflecting dynamic neural processes underlying individual differences in LTM encoding. Lastly, we showed that alpha band-passed IC, but not theta or beta band-passed IC, selectively predicted individual differences in LTM performance. Together, our findings reveal a unique and temporally dynamic neural signature that supports individual differences in LTM encoding, independent of general cognitive abilities.

Indexed as

EEGindividual differencesinterelectrode correlationvisual long-term memory

Identifiers

PMID42094076
PMCPMC13142893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.