ArticleResearch square2026
Roles of systemic CD4
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large-animal models are valuable for investigating the pathogenesis, natural history and therapeutic responses of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We previously developed a porcine EoE model using hen egg white protein (HEWP) sensitization and oral challenge, but additional immunophenotyping is needed - particularly of esophageal mast cells (MC) and systemic CD4 T-cell responses. This study evaluated whether the model induces MC infiltration into the esophagus and whether systemic allergen-specific CD4 T cells correlate with esophageal eosinophilia. Pigs underwent three weekly intraperitoneal sensitizations with HEWP plus cholera toxin followed by one week of daily oral HEWP. Controls included: mock (n=3); sensitization only (n=3); and challenge only (n=3). For EoE induction, nine animals received both sensitization and challenge. MCs were identified by tryptase immunohistochemistry and peak MC counts per high power field (hpf) were manually quantified in the epithelium, lamina propria and muscularis. Systemic HEWP (ovalbumin, OVA)- specific CD4 T cells were quantified via flow cytometry and eosinophilic infiltration was determined by H&E staining. Correlations were analyzed using Spearman's test. Sensitized and challenged pigs exhibited significantly elevated MC infiltration across all esophageal layers compared to controls. MC increases were mild in the epithelium (4.4 ±3.5 MCs/hpf vs 1.7 ±2.4; p=0.0064) but pronounced in the lamina propria (17.9 ±7.8 vs 9.1 ±7.2; p=0.0001) and muscularis (17.2 ±8.0 vs 12.1 ±11.8; p=0.0002). Moreover, systemic OVA-specific CD4 T-cell frequency positively correlated with esophageal eosinophil counts (R2=0.51; p=0.001). These findings support that our EoE model recapitulates the pathogenesis of human EoE as a type-2 inflammatory disease with multicellular infiltrate of eosinophils and MCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.