ArticleResearch square2026
The Brain Vulnerability Index: Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Derived, Community-Informed Geospatial Risk Score for Cognitive Impairment.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Social determinants of health (SDOH) are increasingly recognized as important contributors to cognitive impairment, including Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Existing indices are heavily weighted toward financial indicators and are not validated against cognitive outcomes. We aimed to develop and validate a novel brain-specific SDOH index that identifies high-risk communities for cognitive impairment. Methods: The Brain Vulnerability Index (BVI) integrates patient-level electronic health record data with neighborhood-level SDOH from the Community Vulnerability Compass, a population health analytics framework. In the model development phase, electronic health record data were obtained from patients seen at Parkland Health (Dallas, TX). Cases were defined as individuals with at least one ICD-10 diagnosis suggestive of cognitive impairment from 2015 to 2023 and controls were age-matched with no ICD-10 diagnosis. External validation against serial cognitive performance measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and clinically adjudicated consensus diagnosis of cognitive impairment of any etiology was performed in community-based (Dallas Heart Study) and clinically based (Alzheimer's Disease Research Center) cohorts. Results: The model development sample included 39,570 cases and 192,060 controls. Derived BVI at the block group level achieved detection of electronic health documentation suggestive of cognitive impairment at a balanced accuracy of 54.6%. In external validation (n = 1,395), higher BVI values were associated with lower MoCA scores (β = -0.35; p = 0.009) and with faster cognitive decline (- 1.04 vs - 0.42 MoCA points/year in high- vs low-risk groups; p < 0.0001). BVI was also associated with adjudicated cognitive impairment in the community-based cohort only (p = 0.04). Across analyses, BVI correlated with but outperformed existing neighborhood indices. Conclusions: BVI, a novel multidimensional brain-specific SDOH index, is clinically anchored and is externally validated. It may assist in earlier identification of at-risk communities with accelerated cognitive decline and aid in resource allocation for targeted prevention strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.