Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42093996›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Reinfection as a central constraint on tuberculosis vaccine development.

Pere-Joan Cardona

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pere-Joan CardonaExperimental Tuberculosis Unit (UTE), Institut de Recerca Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Badalona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) vaccine development is hindered by the absence of validated correlates of protection, the low proportion of infected individuals who progress to disease, and the pervasive impact of reinfection in endemic settings. Although several candidates have advanced clinically, only M72/AS01E has demonstrated prevention of disease in adults. These limitations underscore the need to reassess both vaccine objectives and preclinical evaluation strategies. Epidemiological, immunological, and experimental evidence indicates that natural

Indexed as

Mycobacterium tuberculosisReinfectionTuberculosisTuberculosis VaccinesVaccine DevelopmentAnimalsBCG VaccineDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceBCG VaccineTuberculosis VaccinesC3HeB/FeJimmunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosismultiple consecutive infectionsprevention of diseasereinfectionTB vaccinestuberculosisvaccine evaluation models

Identifiers

PMID42093996
PMCPMC13139096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.