ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Prognostic value of longitudinal antinuclear antibody dynamics in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prognostic value of longitudinal antinuclear antibody (ANA) dynamics in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains unclear. Objectives: To examine whether ANA development (titer rise/seroconversion) is associated with 12-month clinical remission and to develop a prediction model for DAS28-CRP remission. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 688 adults with RA (2010 criteria) from 2016-2023. ANA was assessed at baseline and 6 months (± 2 months); development was defined as a ≥1-dilution increase or seroconversion (<1:80 to ≥1:80). The primary endpoint was DAS28-CRP remission at 12 months (<2.6); other endpoints were secondary/exploratory. We used propensity score matching where appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors, with performance assessed by AUC and calibration. Subgroup analyses distinguished seroconversion from titer elevation, and were stratified by baseline RF/anti-CCP status. Sensitivity analyses used a higher positivity threshold (≥1:160). Results: Baseline ANA positivity was 63.7%, typically low titers (1:80, 1:160). Among 467 patients with serial ANA data, 94 (20.1%) exhibited ANA development, which was associated with significantly higher post-treatment disease activity and lower remission rates across multiple criteria (e.g., DAS28-CRP 43.8% vs 65.2%, p=0.004). In multivariable analysis, ANA development independently predicted non-remission (OR 0.472, p=0.010) together with baseline DAS28-CRP (OR 0.745, p=0.017). The prediction model achieved moderate discriminative ability, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.715 in the training cohort and 0.705 in the testing cohort, alongside acceptable calibration. Stratified analysis revealed that the negative prognostic value of ANA development was most pronounced in RF-negative patients (adjusted OR = 0.29, p=0.048). Intriguingly, baseline homogeneous ANA pattern was associated with higher remission rates (63.8% vs. 41.5% in pure speckled pattern, p<0.001). Sensitivity analysis using a ≥1:160 cutoff yielded distinct findings: high ANA titer was associated with a higher likelihood of remission (OR = 1.624, p=0.016). Conclusions: Rising ANA titers/seroconversion during therapy are associated with reduced probability of DAS28-CRP remission at 12 months. The prognostic impact is modulated by baseline RF status, ANA fluorescence patterns, and the titer cutoff used. Conversely, a high baseline ANA titer (≥1:160) itself may identify a subgroup with distinct characteristics. Incorporating ANA dynamics into routine monitoring may improve risk stratification and clinical decision-making in RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.