ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Fly or Dry? River Flow and Dispersal Mode Drive Cross-Channel β Diversity in Riparian Zones.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Terrestrial arthropods form biodiverse communities that support the structure and functioning of riparian ecosystems and are shaped by local to large-scale connectivity in three dimensions. In particular, river characteristics such as size and flow permanence are likely to influence lateral cross-channel connectivity, but how such temporally variable natural barriers shape riparian communities is rarely quantified. We tested the connectivity of communities comprising a diverse family of largely ground-dwelling terrestrial arthropods (ground beetles, Coleoptera: Carabidae) by repeatedly sampling parallel riparian zones along rivers spanning a gradient of flow permanence during flow recession-when declining water levels theoretically reduced the barrier separating communities on left and right banks. We quantified cross-channel connectivity by comparing left-right bank community dissimilarity using Sørensen β diversity and null-model-derived z-scores, distinguishing species capable of flight from those with limited or no flight ability. Communities in parallel riparian zones were similar along the gradient, suggesting that river channels represent comparably weak barriers to cross-channel movement regardless of water levels. In particular, species capable of flight were unaffected by in-channel conditions, whereas the cross-channel comparability of assemblages with limited flight abilities increased as flows declined. The replacement of water-associated species by generalists as flows declined suggests that access to water as a resource may be more important than the barrier posed by water in structuring riparian ground beetle communities. To balance access to key resources, such as water, with the connectivity communities require for long-term resilience, management actions should seek to mitigate climate-driven shifts in spatiotemporal extent of river drying.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.