ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Canopy Definitions Shape Canopy Space Filling-Productivity Relationships: Evidence From Terrestrial Laser Scanning.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many important processes in forest ecosystems are influenced by the spatial structure of the canopy. The spatial arrangement of trees and their branches within the canopy is crucial for light interception, often resulting in a positive relationship between canopy space filling and stand productivity. To date, there is no universal definition of canopy space. However, different parts of the canopy have distinct characteristics, making it crucial to assess the significance of varying canopy definitions. In this study, we investigated how canopy space filling changes with four different definitions of canopy space by using a canopy space filling index (CSFI) derived from terrestrial laser scanning. Moreover, we assessed the relative importance of these definitions in explaining stand productivity. Using data from a tropical tree diversity experiment, we found that CSFI strongly varied with the specific delineation of the canopy space. Across canopy definitions, stand productivity was significantly and positively affected by CSFI, indicating that this relationship was generally robust to varying definitions of canopy space. However, excluding the uppermost part and including the lowest part of the canopy space resulted in a distinct decline of explained variance in productivity. In addition, CSFI played a more important role in regulating productivity in mixtures compared to monocultures. Our results highlight the importance of different layers of the canopy space and tree species richness for a better understanding and assessment of forest dynamics and ecosystem functions. Further research is needed on the relationship between canopy space filling and stand productivity based on different canopy space definitions for mature forests and from different biomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.