ArticleJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases2026
Development of a diagnostic nomogram for tuberculous pleural effusion.
Article in Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A diagnostic nomogram for tuberculous pleural effusion: Methodological considerations.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) is a common form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and remains difficult to diagnose, particularly when distinguishing it from malignant and parapneumonic pleural effusions. Although pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) is widely used, its diagnostic accuracy varies across clinical settings and may be affected by other exudative pleural diseases. This study aimed to develop and validate a diagnostic nomogram based on readily available biomarkers to improve the accuracy of TPE diagnosis. Methods: We performed a case-control study in patients with exudative pleural effusion. Clinical characteristics and serum and pleural fluid biomarkers were analyzed. Independent predictors identified by logistic regression were incorporated into a diagnostic nomogram. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Seventy-nine patients were included, comprising 39 with confirmed TPE and 40 with non-TPE effusions (33 malignant and 7 parapneumonic). Pleural fluid ADA ≥ 40 U/L, serum ADA ≥ 29.2 U/L, and pleural fluid protein ≥ 46.5 g/L were independent predictors of TPE. The nomogram achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00), with 97% sensitivity, 91% specificity, and 94% overall accuracy. Calibration showed excellent agreement between predicted and observed probabilities, and DCA demonstrated superior net clinical benefit over treat-all or treat-none strategies. Conclusions: This nomogram, based on routine laboratory biomarkers, provides a highly accurate and cost-effective tool for diagnosing TPE, particularly in resource-limited, high-burden settings. External validation in larger and more diverse populations is still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.