ArticleOncoscience2026
Sebaceous adenoma of the eyelid: A clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical perspective.
Article in Oncoscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sebaceous adenoma (SA) is a rare, slow-growing benign tumor arising from sebaceous glands, accounting for less than 0.5% of all cutaneous neoplasms and approximately 1-2% of eyelid tumors. The eyelid is an uncommon site for this lesion. Histologically, SA shows well-circumscribed lobules composed of mature sebocytes with vacuolated cytoplasm and a peripheral rim of basaloid cells, without nuclear atypia or mitotic activity. We report a case of an 81-year-old man with a unilateral papillomatous lesion in the left lower eyelid, diagnosed as sebaceous adenoma on histopathology. Immunohistochemistry revealed EMA positivity and a low Ki-67 proliferative index, confirming its benign nature. The rarity of its pseudopapillomatous presentation and its need for differentiation from sebaceous carcinoma highlight the diagnostic importance of this case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.