Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42093905›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2026

Osteoporosis Screening in Primary Care: Early Implementation Gaps Following the 2023 Saudi Guideline Update.

Malak A Alshammari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Malak A AlshammariDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7434-7432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess adherence to the 2023 Saudi Osteoporosis Society (SOS) universal screening guideline among adults aged ≥60 years in an academic primary care center and identify factors associated with DEXA ordering. Methods: A retrospective EMR-based study included 2186 patients aged ≥60 years attending a university-affiliated primary care center (May 2023-December 2025). The primary outcome was adherence to SOS 2023 recommendations. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of BMD ordering. Results: BMD screening was ordered for 19.7% of eligible patients; only 4.1% completed testing. Screening was independently associated with female sex (aOR 5.26), prior osteoporosis (aOR 139.40), prior fracture (aOR 10.35), and female physician sex (aOR 1.50) (all p<0.05). Conclusion: Adherence to universal screening remains low, with a substantial gap between DXA ordering and completion, highlighting important implementation barriers in primary care practice.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceMass ScreeningOsteoporosisPrimary Health CareAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedBone DensityFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesSaudi Arabiabone mineral densityguideline adherenceimplementation gaposteoporosisprimary health careSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID42093905
PMCPMC13142711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.