ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2026
Left ventricular myocardial work and its determinants in healthy subjects and the possible potential correlation with the ventricular myocardial band.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Re: Left ventricular myocardial work and its determinants in healthy subjects and the possible potential correlation with the ventricular myocardial band.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of gender, age and other physiologic parameters on left ventricular (LV) myocardial work (MW) in healthy subjects and to explore the potential correlation between the MW and the ventricular myocardial band (VMB). Methods: According to the inclusion criteria 479 subjects aged ≥20 years old who visited our hospital from September 2019 to August 2022 were enrolled and were divided into three groups by 15 years as the age interval. Among them, 187 were 20-39 years old {(39.04%), including 87 men (46.52%) and 100 women (53.47%)}; 153 were 40-54 years old {(31.94%), including 63 men (41.18%) and 90 women (58.82%)}; 139 were aged ≥55 years {(29.02%), including 75 men (53.96%) and 64 women (46.04%)}. All subjects underwent echocardiography and apical views were analyzed. Blood pressure (BP) was measured after the examination. Results: MW exhibited distinct gender- and age-specific characteristics. Within the same age group, females demonstrated higher MW values than males. Furthermore, a significant age-related decline in MW was observed in females, particularly after 55 years of age. Additionally, the distribution patterns of MW, especially active work, suggested a potential correlation with the VMB. Conclusion: 1. MW evaluating by using echocardiography may be a good method for the assessment of real time, quantitative global and regional MW and the MW has obvious gender and age characteristics.2. There is a certain potential correlation between the MW and the VMB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.