ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Cancer patients' perspectives and practices regarding pharmacogenomic testing and its cost.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pharmacogenomics is a cornerstone of precision medicine. Its major aim is to tailor drug therapy based on individual genetic variations which influence drug pharmacokinetics and dynamics. In the field of oncology, pharmacogenomic testing has become an efficient tool for predicting treatment outcomes and avoiding severe adverse reactions. Understanding the perspectives, attitudes, and willingness of cancer patients toward pharmacogenomic testing is critical for successful implementation. Despite that, research in this area is still inadequate in the Middle East. Method: This cross-sectional study utilized a survey distributed to cancer patients currently receiving chemotherapy at three outpatient oncology clinics in the West Bank, Palestine. Results: The study included 368 participants with an almost equal gender distribution. Only 19.8% of the participants had heard of pharmacogenomic testing, while 4.9% of them claimed to have performed a pharmacogenomic test. About one-third of participants reported no understanding of pharmacogenomic testing, with another 31% understanding "a little." Most of the participants (74%, n = 274) were willing to provide a blood sample for the test, and 53% were willing to pay for the test. The mean maximum out-of-pocket amount the participants were willing to pay was 230 NIS, while the mean reasonable price was 1307 NIS. Conclusion: Across all dimensions, Palestinian patients demonstrated limited awareness but moderate acceptance of pharmacogenomic testing once given some information. Most of the participants expressed their willingness to undergo genetic testing if it could reduce their risk of severe side effects, hospitalizations, or treatment delays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.