Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42093842›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Exposure to the new Medicare Advantage risk adjustment model varies across insurers.

Jeffrey Marr, Andrew M Ryan, David J Meyers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeffrey MarrDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02903, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3733-0244
Andrew M RyanDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
David J MeyersDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02903, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4081-1751

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Medicare Advantage plan payment depends on the health of enrolled patients. As a result, the extent to which beneficiary clinical severity is documented administratively-known as coding intensity-is greater in Medicare Advantage (MA) than in traditional Medicare, which inflates payment to plans. In 2024, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began phasing in a new risk adjustment model intended to reduce the susceptibility of MA payments to higher coding intensity. Methods: Using 2021 data, we compared average MA contract risk scores under the new model and the old model. Results: Risk scores were 5.8% lower under the new risk adjustment model. Differences between average risks scores under the new and old model varied substantially across contracts and insurers. For example, 1 large insurer's risk scores were essentially unchanged across models while another large insurer's risk score was 18% lower under the new model. Contracts with higher estimated coding intensity had greater exposure to the new risk adjustment model. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the new risk adjustment model will likely reduce MA payments due to enhanced coding intensity, with these reductions appropriately targeting insurers that code more intensely.

Indexed as

MedicareMedicare Advantagerisk adjustment

Identifiers

PMID42093842
PMCPMC13143170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.