ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2026
The Clinical Significance of Imaging Biomarkers Discoverable by Anomaly Detection Methods in Retinal Diseases: A Review.
Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Clinical Significance of Imaging Biomarkers Discoverable by Anomaly Detection Methods in Retinal Diseases: A Review.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The increasing prevalence of vision-threatening retinal diseases poses a growing challenge on healthcare systems worldwide, underscoring the need for effective strategies in disease diagnosis and management. Unsupervised artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, such as anomaly detection, offer the potential to identify established and novel retinal imaging biomarkers. They reduce reliance on expert-driven annotations, mitigate bias, and overcome the limitations of predefined disease categories. Moreover, when integrated into clinical workflows, they have the potential to enhance practical applicability by supporting efficient screening, longitudinal disease monitoring, and objective assessment of treatment response. Areas Covered: This review examines the role of anomaly detection for discovering clinically relevant retinal imaging biomarkers, by categorizing biomarkers according to their underlying pathophysiology, summarizing the spectrum of anomaly detection methods applied in the field, and highlighting biomarkers that have been identified through these approaches. Critical Appraisal: Current anomaly detection methods favor the identification of established biomarkers characterized by strong intensity contrasts and well-defined structural boundaries, while more subtle abnormalities remain difficult to capture. Future research should prioritize integrating large language models (LLMs), foundation methods, multimodality, and few-shot anomaly detection, and increase explainability to advance the clinical application of anomaly detection for retinal imaging biomarker discovery in ophthalmology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.