ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026
Knowledge Discovery and Drug-Repurposing Framework for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Molecular Networking and Computational Docking.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies, driven by profound molecular heterogeneity and resistance to current therapy. To support systematic target identification, we established a proteomics-anchored knowledge discovery framework integrating cross-model proteomics harmonization, network topology, high-confidence structural modeling, and large-scale in silico docking. From 1,975 proteins consistently detected across murine and human PDAC models, 32 immunohistochemically confirmed candidates were prioritized for structure-based screening against 7,509 clinically characterized compounds. Blind docking, refined pose sampling, ligand-efficiency scoring, and ADME filtering identified EIF2A, STAM, ANXA2, and AHNAK2 as robustly druggable targets. These proteins exhibited high-affinity interactions with zavegepant (a clinically approved CGRP receptor antagonist), omilancor, bemcentinib, conivaptan, and APTO-253. Docking validation (RMSD 1.98 to 2.56 Å) confirmed methodological reliability, and network analyses placed the 4 proteins within modules linked to endosomal/membrane trafficking and invasive phenotypes. Survival analyses in 176 PDAC patients further supported their clinical relevance. Thus, we suggest a systems-level platform for nominating ligandable PDAC targets and clinically actionable compounds. The framework highlights opportunities for rational drug repurposing and motivates future mechanistic studies at the intersection of proteomics and structure-based screening for targets to PDAC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.