Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42093733›Full record

ArticleCerebral circulation - cognition and behavior2026

Sex differences in documented clinical features of memory clinic patients: a natural language processing study.

Sanne Kuipers, L Malin Overmars, Bram van Es, Sander C Tan, Jet M J Vonk, Majon Muller, Mark C H de Groot, Wouter W van Solinge, Saskia Haitjema, Michiel L Bots and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sanne KuipersDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
L Malin OvermarsDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Bram van EsCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Sander C TanDepartment for Research & Data Technology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
Jet M J VonkMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Majon MullerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mark C H de GrootCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Wouter W van SolingeCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Saskia HaitjemaCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Michiel L BotsJulius Center, for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Geert Jan BiesselsDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Lieza G ExaltoDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sex differences in signs and symptoms of cognitive impairment are well described in research cohorts, but whether they are reflected in routine clinical documentation is unknown. Methods: We applied natural language processing to clinical letters from 915 memory clinic patients in the Utrecht Patient-Oriented Database. Sex differences in documented clinical features were assessed with logistic regression, with and without age adjustment. Benjamini-Hochberg correction was applied for multiple comparisons. Results: We included 1036 clinical letters from 915 patients (47% women; mean age 66 ± 14 vs. 67 ± 13 years, p = 0.6). The most common clinical features were memory problems (56.5% overall) and forgetting intended actions (49.6%). After correction for multiple comparisons, no significant sex differences remained. At the nominal level, women more often had documentation of stress (OR 0.39), headache (OR 0.63), and calendar use for memory support (OR 0.66); men more often had documentation of getting angry easily (OR 1.72) and short-term memory problems (OR 1.70). Discussion: This exploratory study identified suggestive but non-significant sex differences in documented clinical features in memory clinic practice. Differences may reflect variation in occurrence, reporting, or documentation habits, and warrant replication in larger, diagnosis-stratified samples.

Indexed as

Clinical featuresCognitive impairmentMachine learningMemory clinicNatural language processingRoutine care dataSex differences

Identifiers

PMID42093733
PMCPMC13142027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.