ArticleCerebral circulation - cognition and behavior2026
Sex differences in documented clinical features of memory clinic patients: a natural language processing study.
Article in Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sex differences in signs and symptoms of cognitive impairment are well described in research cohorts, but whether they are reflected in routine clinical documentation is unknown. Methods: We applied natural language processing to clinical letters from 915 memory clinic patients in the Utrecht Patient-Oriented Database. Sex differences in documented clinical features were assessed with logistic regression, with and without age adjustment. Benjamini-Hochberg correction was applied for multiple comparisons. Results: We included 1036 clinical letters from 915 patients (47% women; mean age 66 ± 14 vs. 67 ± 13 years, p = 0.6). The most common clinical features were memory problems (56.5% overall) and forgetting intended actions (49.6%). After correction for multiple comparisons, no significant sex differences remained. At the nominal level, women more often had documentation of stress (OR 0.39), headache (OR 0.63), and calendar use for memory support (OR 0.66); men more often had documentation of getting angry easily (OR 1.72) and short-term memory problems (OR 1.70). Discussion: This exploratory study identified suggestive but non-significant sex differences in documented clinical features in memory clinic practice. Differences may reflect variation in occurrence, reporting, or documentation habits, and warrant replication in larger, diagnosis-stratified samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.