Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42093692›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Crop yield responses to seaweed extract-based biostimulants depend on application strategy, formulation, and extraction methods: a meta-analysis.

Christian José Pérez-Oñate, Mayara Cristina Malvas Nicolau, Tatiane Cristovam Ferreira, Fernando Broetto, João William Bossolani, Marco Montes de Oca, Willi Heitmann, Cleiton José Alves, Marcos de Oliveira Bettini, German Arturo Moreno-Poveda and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Christian José Pérez-OñateDoctoral Program in Sustainable Agriculture, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima, Peru.
Mayara Cristina Malvas NicolauDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Brazil.
Tatiane Cristovam FerreiraDepartment of Rural Engineering, School of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Fernando BroettoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
João William BossolaniCollege of Agricultural Sciences (FCA), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Marco Montes de OcaDepartment of Bioinformatics, Neocrop Technologies SpA, Valdivia, Chile.
Willi HeitmannMaster's Program in Plant Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
Cleiton José AlvesAcadian Seaplants Limited, Dartmouth, NS, Canada.
Marcos de Oliveira BettiniAcadian Seaplants Limited, Dartmouth, NS, Canada.
German Arturo Moreno-PovedaDoctoral Program in Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Diego Villaseñor-OrtizSchool of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad Técnica de Machala (UTMACH), Machala, Ecuador.
Leonardo Cury da SilvaPostgraduate Program in Viticulture and Enology, Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Sul (IFRS), Bento Gonçalves, Brazil.
Samir Geraigire FilhoAcadian Seaplants Limited, Dartmouth, NS, Canada.
Holly LittleAcadian Seaplants Limited, Dartmouth, NS, Canada.
Sarah MaudeAcadian Seaplants Limited, Dartmouth, NS, Canada.
Marciel J StadnikDepartment of Plant Sciences, School of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seaweed extract-based biostimulants have attracted sustained attention in agronomic research because of their biochemical diversity and their capacity to influence multiple plant processes. However, evidence on their yield effects remains fragmented across crops, environments, and management contexts. To address this gap, we synthesized data from 198 peer-reviewed studies encompassing 2,021 independent comparisons between seaweed extract treatments and untreated or conventionally managed controls. Crop yield and biomass responses were quantified using log response ratios and analyzed with inverse-variance weighted random-effects models estimated by restricted maximum likelihood. Variability among studies was explored in relation to climate, stress exposure, experimental setting, soil chemical properties, crop groups, phenological timing, application strategies, formulation characteristics, extraction methods, and algae species. Across all studies, seaweed extract applications increased yield by an average of 16.3% (95% CI: 13.5-19.1%), with positive responses observed under both stress and non-stress conditions. The largest effects occurred in tropical and arid regions and were most pronounced in vegetables, legumes, and cereals. Soil phosphorus and potassium availability, pH, salinity, and organic matter content influenced response magnitude but did not reverse the overall benefit. Higher and more consistent responses were associated with soil-directed applications, early-stage programs, powder formulations, and alkaline extraction processes. Among species,

Indexed as

crop yieldextraction methodmeta-analysisseaweed extractsoil- environment interactions

Identifiers

PMID42093692
PMCPMC13139174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.