ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Crop yield responses to seaweed extract-based biostimulants depend on application strategy, formulation, and extraction methods: a meta-analysis.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seaweed extract-based biostimulants have attracted sustained attention in agronomic research because of their biochemical diversity and their capacity to influence multiple plant processes. However, evidence on their yield effects remains fragmented across crops, environments, and management contexts. To address this gap, we synthesized data from 198 peer-reviewed studies encompassing 2,021 independent comparisons between seaweed extract treatments and untreated or conventionally managed controls. Crop yield and biomass responses were quantified using log response ratios and analyzed with inverse-variance weighted random-effects models estimated by restricted maximum likelihood. Variability among studies was explored in relation to climate, stress exposure, experimental setting, soil chemical properties, crop groups, phenological timing, application strategies, formulation characteristics, extraction methods, and algae species. Across all studies, seaweed extract applications increased yield by an average of 16.3% (95% CI: 13.5-19.1%), with positive responses observed under both stress and non-stress conditions. The largest effects occurred in tropical and arid regions and were most pronounced in vegetables, legumes, and cereals. Soil phosphorus and potassium availability, pH, salinity, and organic matter content influenced response magnitude but did not reverse the overall benefit. Higher and more consistent responses were associated with soil-directed applications, early-stage programs, powder formulations, and alkaline extraction processes. Among species,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.