ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Estimation of chlorophyll content in cotton leaves using UAV RGB imagery.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and non-destructive acquisition of leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) in cotton plant canopies is of significant importance for real-time monitoring of cotton growth and implementing precise water and nitrogen management in cotton fields. This study utilized UAV-based RGB imagery combined with real-time kinematic (RTK) technology to efficiently and accurately retrieve LCC under different nitrogen application levels in a cotton field, employing 6 machine learning algorithms: Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression (LASSO), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR), Random Forest Regression (RFR), Ridge Regression (Ridge), and Support Vector Regression (SVR). Among these, the SVR model demonstrated the best overall performance, with coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error (RMSE), relative root mean square error (rRMSE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values of 0.82, 0.14 mg/g, 8.91%, and 6.99% for the training set, and 0.75, 0.14 mg/g, 8.90%, and 7.83% for the testing set, respectively. Furthermore, the SVR model was applied to retrieve LCC pixel-by-pixel from UAV imagery, and pseudo-color rendering techniques were used to generate spatial distribution maps of LCC in the cotton canopy, visually presenting the spatial variability characteristics of LCC within the field. The results indicate that the cotton canopy LCC estimation method based on UAV RGB imagery combined with RTK technology achieves comparable accuracy to the more expensive multispectral and hyperspectral techniques, without a significant reduction in precision. This approach provides an efficient, low-cost, and reliable method for detecting canopy LCC in small-scale cotton fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.