ArticleEJVES vascular forum2026
Management of a Left Common Carotid Artery Aneurysm by Double Branched Endovascular Arch Replacement Using Tandem Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis Deployments.
Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Branched thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair has become an increasingly common intervention since the advent of custom made and now off the shelf devices. This report describes the use of a sequential double deployment of the Gore TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE; WL Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) to exclude a left common carotid artery aneurysm (LCCAA) due to large vessel vasculitis (LVV). Report: A 39 year old man (smoker, schizophrenic, known antiphospholipid syndrome, and previous deep vein thromboses) presented with a 45 mm LCCAA eight months after resection of a left carotid bulb aneurysm (using a reversed great saphenous vein, which had later occluded). Special investigations and multidisciplinary discussion highlighted the suspicion of LVV involving the arch outflow, and thus an endovascular treatment approach was selected. Sequential dual TBE devices were deployed for branch thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair from Ishimaru zone 3 to zone 0C with coil embolisation of the LCCAA. Successful exclusion of the LCCAA and maintenance of arch branch patency were achieved. Following referral to a tertiary rheumatology centre, the post-operative phase was particularly complicated by a haemorrhagic stroke, which was successfully treated by neurosurgical intervention. The patient continues to be stable at four months and is maintained on long term immunosuppressant, antiplatelet, lipid lowering, and anticoagulant therapy. Discussion: The use of an off the shelf device like the TBE allows modular totally endovascular arch reconstruction, facilitated here by the permissive effect of the left carotid outflow already being sacrificed. Endovascular options may provide an initial solution for treating aortic arch branch vessel aneurysms, thus reducing the morbidity and mortality of open surgical arch reconstructions, but an overall multidisciplinary approach is mandated for the management of such patients with long term follow up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.