Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42093669›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt: a surgical strategy with no expiration date.

Luis Emmanuel Ruiz Pérez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Luis Emmanuel Ruiz PérezDeparment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hospital ISSSTE Villahermosa, Tabasco, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Systemic-to-pulmonary shunts remain a fundamental surgical option in the palliative management of complex congenital heart defects, particularly in patients with univentricular physiology. Although technically demanding, the procedure has evolved through multiple modifications aimed at simplifying its execution and reducing complications, while maintaining its essential clinical role. Objective: To provide a narrative review of the Blalock-Taussig-Thomas shunt, examining its physiological basis, surgical technique, associated risks and complications, postoperative management, and historical evolution, with the goal of evaluating its continued relevance in the palliative treatment of complex congenital heart defects. Methods: A literature search was conducted in Elsevier, PubMed, and Scopus using the keyword "systemic-to-pulmonary shunt." Studies addressing historical development, technical evolution, clinical indications, and postoperative outcomes were included. The review focused on pediatric populations, specifically prenatal, neonatal, and school-age patients. Studies involving adolescents were excluded to maintain consistency with early developmental stages and the typical clinical context in which these shunts are used. Results & conclusion: The systemic-to-pulmonary shunt remains a valuable and widely used palliative technique for patients with complex congenital heart defects and univentricular physiology. While the original Blalock-Taussig-Thomas technique has historically shown favorable outcomes, differences in complication rates among its variants are influenced by patient selection and institutional experience. Emerging alternatives, such as ductal stenting, may reduce the frequency of surgical shunt placement in selected patients; however, they do not currently replace the systemic-to-pulmonary shunt as a comprehensive or universally applicable strategy.

Indexed as

congenital heart diseasepalliative cardiac surgerypulmonary ductal stentsystemic to pulmonary artery shuntuniventricular heart

Identifiers

PMID42093669
PMCPMC13139086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.