Observational studyActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026
Cognitive Functioning After Circulatory Shock: A Prospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive impairment in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors is multifactorial and can affect especially memory, attention, and executive functions. This study aimed to determine the cognitive functioning of patients with circulatory shock immediately after ICU discharge and 3 months later.
methodsThis study, ASSESS-SHOCK 2, is a preplanned sub-study of the observational ASSESS-SHOCK study conducted at Helsinki University Hospital ICU. We included adults with circulatory shock, defined as hypotension requiring vasopressor infusion and concomitant signs of hypoperfusion. We excluded patients with severe neurological or psychiatric diagnoses, impairment of hearing or vision, developmental disability, and language barriers. Cognitive functioning of patients was assessed within 3 days of ICU discharge and 3 months thereafter with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. We defined cognitive impairment as MoCA score < 26 points. We also included data of 48 volunteer controls, tested once, to analyses.
resultsFifty-five patients underwent an assessment within 3 days of ICU discharge, and 36 of them completed a follow-up assessment at 3 months. At discharge median MoCA-score was 22 (IQR 17-25). At the 3 months follow-up, the median MoCA-score was 26.5 points (IQR 24.25-28) showing improvement from discharge to follow-up (p < 0.001). The prevalence of cognitive impairment at discharge was 78.2%, and, at the 3-month follow-up 44.4%. In the control group, the median MoCA score was 27 points (IQR 25-28) and the prevalence of cognitive impairment 33%.
conclusionWe found cognitive impairment in more than three out of four ICU survivors immediately after ICU treatment for circulatory shock. We observed an improvement in cognitive functioning between ICU discharge and 3 months follow-up. These results have importance considering the optimal timing of information given to patients and when involving patients in decision-making. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This study used the MoCA score to investigate the change in cognitive impairment in patients who survived circulatory shock, from the time of discharge from intensive care to 3 months after discharge. Scores indicated more severe cognitive dysfunction compared to controls at the time of discharge, but these improved to match control scores 3 months later. The findings have important implications for strategies to inform and support newly discharged ICU survivors who have experienced circulatory shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.