ArticleOccupational therapy international2026
Preschool Hand Function Assessment Instruments: A Scoping Review With Targeted Analysis of Performance-Based Instruments.
Article in Occupational therapy international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preschool Hand Function Assessment Instruments: A Scoping Review With Targeted Analysis of Performance-Based Instruments.Occupational therapy international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hand function is a critical determinant of preschool children's participation in everyday occupations. Accurate hand function assessment is vital for guiding interventions, yet assessment practices are highly variable. Despite the abundance of instruments, only a few standardised performance-based tools assess all hand function components. No comprehensive mapping exists of key preschool instrument specifications to guide clinicians and researchers, particularly those working in diverse contexts. The study mapped all published hand function-relevant instruments used with children aged 3-5 years, including pathology-specific measures, proxy-report tools, classification systems, and multidomain developmental assessments. Employing scoping review methodology, 13 databases were searched, and all retrieved sources up to September 2024 were managed on Covidence. Two independent reviewers conducted title, abstract and full-text screenings based on eligibility criteria. The search found 810 sources, with 84 meeting inclusion criteria, identifying 62 instruments. Most were performance-based (n = 46; 74.2%), followed by proxy measures (n = 11), classifications (n = 3) and two unspecified. Over a third targeted children with health conditions, whilst 22 covered both typical and atypical development. Sources from the Global South and LMICs were notably scarce. Performance-based measures were examined in greater depth, with only one addressing all hand function domains. Findings highlight the need for a standardised, culturally adaptable performance-based tool that reflects preschool children's real-world occupations and is applicable across diverse settings. This review offers a structured foundation for developing or adapting such a tool, bridging current gaps in assessment practice in both high- and low-resource environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.