Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42093286›Full record

ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2026

[Experimental curriculum design for undergraduates based on the improvement of scientific research abilities: taking determination of pyrimidine fungicides in soil by QuEChERS-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry as an example].

Fenglian Lyu, Xiaoling Shan, Ran Zhao, Wei Zheng

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fenglian Lyunull;null.
Xiaoling Shannull;null.
Ran Zhaonull;null.
Wei Zhengnull.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Undergraduate experimental courses are a key way to cultivate students' scientific research practice and innovation abilities. The traditional experimental teaching mode of "emphasizing process and neglecting inquiry" limits the development of students' scientific research thinking and innovation ability. Especially in the field of analytical chemistry, technical teaching involving techniques such as GC-MS is limited to confirmatory experiments, which is difficult to meet practical needs. In this paper, a comprehensive experimental teaching scheme integrating method development and problem exploration is constructed based on the development of detection methods for pyrimidine fungicides in soil. It covers four links: method establishment, technology optimization, data analysis and extended verification. The teaching method of group cooperation and personal display is adopted to guide students to optimize the relevant parameters of QuEChERS-GC-MS method and encourage them to independently discover and solve problems independently. The results showed that 1% acetic acid acetonitrile (20 mL) was the optimal extraction solvent; 500 mg PSA+500 mg C18+500 mg GCB+1.2 g MgSO

Indexed as

CurriculumFungicides, IndustrialGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryPyrimidinesSoil PollutantsSoilStudentsFungicides, IndustrialpyrimidinePyrimidinesSoilSoil Pollutantsdetection of pesticide residuesexperimental teaching reformgas chromatography-mass spectrometryQuEChERSscientific research ability training

Identifiers

PMID42093286
PMCPMC13150825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.