Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42093282›Full record

ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2026

[Determination of six whitening ingredients in cosmetics by ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled with photodiode array detector and corona charged aerosol detector].

Xiaofang Li, Ye Wang, Fan Fan, Wei Zhou, Bin Chen, Huajin Shi, Guoqiang Cai, Ying Liu, Yibo He

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaofang Li1. NICE Zhejiang Technology Co. Ltd. ,Hangzhou 310056,China.
Ye Wang1. NICE Zhejiang Technology Co. Ltd. ,Hangzhou 310056,China.
Fan Fan1. NICE Zhejiang Technology Co. Ltd. ,Hangzhou 310056,China.
Wei Zhou1. NICE Zhejiang Technology Co. Ltd. ,Hangzhou 310056,China.
Bin Chen2. Nanjing Institute for Comprehensive Utilization of Wild Plants,Nanjing 211100,China.
Huajin Shi3. Thermo Fisher Scientific (China) Co. Ltd. ,Shanghai 201206,China.
Guoqiang Cai1. NICE Zhejiang Technology Co. Ltd. ,Hangzhou 310056,China.
Ying Liu1. NICE Zhejiang Technology Co. Ltd. ,Hangzhou 310056,China.
Yibo He4. NICE Group Co. ,Ltd. ,Lishui 323000,China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whitening is a core function of cosmetics, and ingredients including acetyl glucosamine, tranexamic acid, nicotinamide, phenethyl resorcinol, glabridin, and ascorbyl tetraisopalmitate are widely used due to their clearly established whitening mechanisms. However, existing analytical methods face notable limitations: photodiode array detectors (PDA) cannot reliably detect weakly or non-ultraviolet (UV)-absorbing components; evaporative light scattering detectors (ELSD) suffer from inadequate sensitivity for low-concentration analytes; mass spectrometry (MS) is costly; and single-column cannot achieve the separation of ingredients with significantly different polarities. To address these challenges, this study established an analytical method for the determination of the six whitening ingredients in cosmetics using ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled with a photodiode array detector and a corona charged aerosol detector (UPLC-PDA-CAD). For sample pretreatment: 0.2 g of sample was weighed, and 10 mL dichloromethane and 10 mL deionized water were added for vortex extraction of whitening ingredients. The mixture was then centrifuged for phase separation. The aqueous layer and dichloromethane layer were collected separately. The aqueous layer was washed twice with dichloromethane; all dichloromethane fractions were combined, concentrated to less than 1 mL under a nitrogen stream, and finally made up to volume with isopropanol. Both the aqueous layer and the reconstituted isopropanol solution were filtered through 0.22 μm hydrophilic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes before UPLC injection. For chromatographic separation, a Waters HSS T3 column (150 mm×2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) was selected. The column temperature was set at 40 ℃, the injection volume was 1 μL, and the flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. The mobile phase consisted of isopropanol, acetonitrile, and 20 mmol/L ammonium acetate solution (pH adjusted to 4.5 using formic acid), using a gradient elution program. For detection, a tandem PDA-CAD system was used: PDA (scan range 200-400 nm) was employed for components with UV absorption, while CAD (nebulization temperature 35 °C, acquisition frequency 5 Hz) was used for components with weak UV absorption. Quantification was performed using the external standard method.Method validation results showed good linear relationships for all six whitening ingredients within their respective concentration ranges. The correlation coefficients (

Indexed as

CosmeticsSkin Lightening PreparationsAerosolsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidAerosolsCosmeticsSkin Lightening Preparationscorona charged aerosol detector (CAD)cosmeticsphotodiode array detector(PDA)ultra performance liquid chromatography(UPLC)whitening ingredients

Identifiers

PMID42093282
PMCPMC13150828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.