ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2026
Between reality and meaning: a qualitative study on virtual reality as a compassionate technology in end-of-life care.
Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVirtual reality (VR) is increasingly recognized as a supportive tool in palliative care due to its potential to promote relaxation, emotional comfort, and spiritual reflection. In Thailand, where end-of-life care is shaped by family relationships, Buddhist beliefs, and the value of a peaceful death, little is known about how VR is perceived in this context.
aimTo explore perceptions, emotional and spiritual needs, and anticipated acceptability of VR in end-of-life care among terminally ill patients, family caregivers, and palliative care professionals in Thailand.
methodA qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 15 purposively selected participants, including five terminally ill patients, five family caregivers, and five healthcare professionals. The study focused on anticipated rather than directly experienced use of VR. Interviews were conducted in Thai, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using inductive content analysis. Rigor was enhanced through investigator triangulation, reflexive memo writing, peer debriefing, and an audit trail.
resultsFour interrelated themes were developed: (1) emotional and existential needs, including longing for home, peace, and unresolved concerns; (2) spirituality and meaning, where VR was perceived as a medium for reflection and religious connection; (3) facilitators and barriers, including perceived benefits alongside concerns about usability, emotional impact, and staff workload; and (4) compassionate innovation, reflecting the potential of VR to support dignity, comfort, and meaning at the end of life. Participants viewed VR not merely as a distraction tool, but as a means of symbolic connection and emotional support.
conclusionIn this Thai palliative care context, VR was perceived as a potentially compassionate and culturally meaningful technology that may support emotional, existential, and spiritual well-being when tailored to patient readiness, cultural values, and clinical feasibility. As findings reflect anticipated perceptions, further research is needed to evaluate its practical, emotional, and ethical impacts in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.