Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42093179›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Predicting and Decoding Allosteric Binding Sites Using Protein Language Models and Structure-Based Machine Learning: An Energy Landscape-Guided Explainable AI Framework.

Kamila Riedlová, Vít Škrhák, William G Gatlin, Max Ludwick, Lucas Turano, Marian Novotný, David Hoksza, Gennady M Verkhivker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kamila RiedlováDepartment of Software Engineering, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague 11800, Czech Republic.
Vít ŠkrhákDepartment of Software Engineering, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague 11800, Czech Republic.
William G GatlinKeck Center for Science and Engineering, Graduate Program in Computational and Data Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, California 92866, United States.
Max LudwickKeck Center for Science and Engineering, Graduate Program in Computational and Data Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, California 92866, United States.
Lucas TuranoKeck Center for Science and Engineering, Graduate Program in Computational and Data Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, California 92866, United States.
Marian NovotnýDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 11800, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8788-3202
David HokszaDepartment of Software Engineering, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague 11800, Czech Republic.
Gennady M VerkhivkerKeck Center for Science and Engineering, Graduate Program in Computational and Data Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, California 92866, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4507-4471

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational prediction of allosteric binding sites in protein structures remains a persistent challenge, as these regulatory pockets evade detection by both sequence-based and structure-based algorithms. Both computational and physical origins of this predictive asymmetry remain insufficiently understood. In this study, we systematically examine the determinants of binding site predictability using a dual framework that integrates a fine-tuned protein language model and the structure-based method P2Rank as complementary tools probing a diverse data set of 453 human kinases, together with a physics-based interpretability layer derived from energy landscape frustration analysis. Both predictors exhibit a sharp and reproducible dichotomy on protein kinases, in which orthosteric ATP-binding sites can be identified with high precision, whereas allosteric sites are detected with substantially lower confidence across kinase structures and distinct conformational states. To decode this divergence, we deploy energy landscape-based explainable AI approach that integrates local frustration analysis as an independent physical interpretability layer, mapping predictive behavior to the underlying energetic organization of protein structures. This analysis reveals that predictive success is governed by the local energetic embedding of binding sites within the protein energy landscape. Orthosteric pockets are located in minimally frustrated basins that generate strong evolutionary and structural signatures, whereas allosteric pockets occupy predominantly neutrally frustrated zones associated with conformational plasticity and reduced evolutionary constraint. By integrating the prediction results with energy landscape analysis, our framework converts predictive performance into physically interpretable descriptors of binding site organization in protein kinases. These results establish energy landscape frustration as a potentially important determinant of algorithmic visibility and an interpretability layer providing a feasible strategy for diagnosing the limits of current prediction methods.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProtein KinasesAllosteric SiteBinding SitesHumansModels, MolecularPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsProtein ConformationThermodynamicsProtein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID42093179
PMCPMC13217555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.