ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2026
Digital emergency routing: analysis of feasibility, utilization, and equity implications.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital emergency care applications offer potential to reduce delays, enhance triage, and improve care coordination, yet evidence remains limited on their real-world implementation at scale. Maccabi Healthcare Services developed Maccabi-RED, a mobile application allowing patients to request urgent community-based care as an alternative to hospital emergency department visits. This study examines the implementation and utilization of Maccabi-RED during 2020-2023, aiming to describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients initiating emergency care requests, identify factors associated with request approval and successful routing to community-based care and examine healthcare utilization patterns following app-initiated requests.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed de-identified electronic health record data from Maccabi Healthcare Services, including all patient-initiated emergency care requests through the Maccabi-RED application between January 2020 and December 2023. The study included 94,795 requests from 77,508 patients. We extracted demographic and clinical variables and examine patterns of subsequent healthcare utilization in the week following app-initiated emergency care requests, comparing approved versus non-approved requests.
resultsDuring the study period, 51.6% of requests were approved, resulting in urgent community clinic appointments. Service utilization increased substantially from 11,058 requests in 2020 to 36,532 in 2023. Approved requests were more common among older patients and those with chronic conditions. Emergency type strongly influenced approval rates, with foreign body cases showing substantially higher approval odds than orthopedic cases. Geographic, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in approval rates were observed. In adjusted analyses, approved requests were associated with lower 7-day healthcare utilization, including fewer primary care physician visits and reduced odds of hospital emergency department and emergency medical center visits.
conclusionsThe Maccabi-RED application demonstrates feasibility of scaling patient-initiated digital emergency routing, with potential to reduce downstream acute care utilization. However, observed approval disparities across age groups, geographic regions, and socioeconomic strata indicate that digital maturity alone does not guarantee equitable access. These findings underscore the importance of embedding equity considerations in system design, monitoring protocols, and capacity planning. Future development, including artificial intelligence-enabled decision support, should prioritize transparency and algorithmic fairness to improve performance without amplifying existing health inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.