Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2026
The ARTEMIS trial identifies immune activation as a key predictor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer.
Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02276443 (ARTEMIS), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ARTEMIS: A Robust TNBC Evaluation FraMework to Improve Survival
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSelecting treatments for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains challenging due to its high molecular and phenotypic heterogeneity. To maximize response rates, nearly all patients are treated with an aggressive combination of chemo-immunotherapy. However, since half of patients respond to chemotherapy alone and about a third do not respond at all, the majority of patients would benefit from alternative regimens. Thus, there is a pressing need to better personalize or de-escalate therapy using response-based biomarkers.
methodsTo address this need, we conducted the ARTEMIS randomized trial (NCT02276443) to test whether a molecular classifier could predict response to treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in early-stage TNBC, and to understand the correlates of response.
resultsThis study found that integrating a molecular classifier did not result in a statistically significant improvement in responses to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC), which increased from 33% pCR to 41% (p = 0.43). To identify more robust correlates of response, we found that the strongest predictors were related to the immune system. Using immune cell markers, tumors could be categorized into three subtypes linked to chemoresponse, "immune hot sensitive," "immune hot resistant," and "immune cold." Notably, 50% of the immune hot tumors exhibited a pathological complete response, compared to only 8% of the immune cold tumors. The immune cold tumors represented a group of TNBC tumors characterized by chemoresistance, a mesenchymal phenotype, and signatures of FGF and TGF-β signaling, suggesting potential therapeutic strategies. Among the immune hot tumors, the sensitive subtype showed a stronger immune response and distinct spatial organization between cancer and immune cells compared to the resistant subtype despite their largely similar gene expression profiles.
conclusionsThese data indicate that the immune contexture is a critical factor in the response to AC chemotherapy and provides a framework for selecting more effective and less toxic therapies for patients with TNBC.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02276443 2014-10-24.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.