ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2026
The Electronic Psychiatric Semi-structured Interview for Children and Adolescents (EPSI-C): development and psychometric evaluation of an open-access DSM-5-based diagnostic instrument.
Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStandardized diagnostic interviews are essential tools for accurate assessment in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP). However, many existing interviews are restricted by licensing costs, platform dependencies, limited clinical adaptability, or legal ambiguity regarding digital implementation. To address these limitations, the Electronic Psychiatric Semi-structured Interview for Children and Adolescents (EPSI-C) was developed as an open-access, platform-independent instrument aligned with the DSM-5. The modular structure, comprising 22 modules covering the full range of common psychiatric disorders, allows for both systematic and targeted administration. This instrument development and psychometric validation study evaluated the content validity and internal consistency of the EPSI-C.
methodsContent validity was assessed by ten independent experts who rated the relevance of the instrument for assessing DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. Additionally, experts rated six global aspects of clinical utility. Internal consistency was examined in a large naturalistic sample of 3,506 patients (mean age = 12.0 years, SD = 3.2, range 5-18 years; 54.5% girls) assessed with a digital implementation of the EPSI-C during routine outpatient CAP assessments in Sweden.
resultsThe EPSI-C demonstrated excellent scale-level average content validity for both the screening sections (S-CVI/Ave = 0.95) and full modules (S-CVI/Ave = 0.94). Expert consensus was high (90-100%) regarding overall clinical utility. Internal consistency was acceptable to excellent (α range 0.71 - 0.90) for 87.5% of eligible modules. Lower consistency was observed for modules assessing psychotic disorders (α = 0.53) and anorexia nervosa (α = 0.49), reflecting limited DSM-5 criteria and sub-threshold presentations.
conclusionsThe findings support the foundational psychometric properties of the EPSI-C and indicate its clinical feasibility within a high-volume, naturalistic CAP outpatient setting. The current study establishes content validity and internal consistency, while criterion validity remains to be evaluated. As an open-access, modular instrument, EPSI-C offers a scalable solution for the digital implementation of standardized diagnostic interviews in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.