ArticleThyroid research2026
Multiple machine learning models for the prediction of an early response to radioactive iodine therapy in hyperthyroidism: ablative dose concept.
Article in Thyroid research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this novel study was to explore the possibility of the development of a machine learning (ML) model that can predict early response to radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy in patients with hyperthyroidism on the basis of demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging features.
methodsA total of 914 patients who received RAI for the treatment of hyperthyroidism between January 2000 and December 2023 were included in the study. The early positive response, defined as an accomplishment of hypothyroidism (thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) > 4 mIU/L) in the 6-month period following RAI therapy, was accomplished in 336 patients (36.76%) (hypothyroidism group), whereas hypothyroidism was not accomplished in 578 patients (63.24%) (control group). The training data consisted of 90% of the sample (822 patients), whereas the test set contained 92 patients. Multiple ML models, including k-nearest neighbors, random forest, various gradient boosting algorithms, and neural networks, were trained via AutoGluon.
resultsThe neural network model performed the best, with a balanced accuracy of 68.81%, sensitivity of 61.76%, specificity of 75.86%, PPV of 60.0%, NPV of 77.19%, and F1 score of 60.87%, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.706 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.593-0.809; receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve analysis). In the development of the top-performing model, baseline TSH, age, 24-h radioactive iodine uptake, dose, and duration of previous treatment with antithyroid drugs (ATDs) were the most important features.
conclusionsWe developed models for the prediction of the response to RAI in patients with hyperthyroidism. However, these models require further development before they can be applied in clinical practice. By introducing more variables and increasing the sample size, the model performance can increase further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.