ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Spiritual needs in palliative care inpatients: a four-year analysis of clinical data from a tertiary care center.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpiritual needs are a core dimension of palliative care, yet their systematic documentation remains limited. This study explores the spiritual needs expressed by palliative care inpatients and examines how these needs vary in documentation based on gender, below and above the Swiss retirement age, religious affiliation, and specialty documenting them.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 747 electronic health records (EHRs) from the Acute Palliative Care Unit at the University Hospital Zurich (2019-2022). Documentation by psychological and pastoral care services was analyzed using qualitative content analysis along with chi-square test for explorative purposes. Identified needs were categorized according to an adapted four-domain framework (existential, psychological, social/relational, religious).
resultsA total of 598 patients were analyzed (median age 68 years (20-97), 52.8% (n = 316) male). We identified 22 distinct spiritual needs. Overall, 61.2% (n = 366) of patients expressed existential needs, 78.9% (n = 472) psychological needs, 66.2% 396) social/relational needs, and 17.4% (n = 104) religious needs. The most common spiritual needs were life reflection (55.5%, n = 332), relationship and family dynamics (43.6%, n = 337), and history of illness (26.8%, n = 160). Women reported significantly more existential fears (p < 0.001), relational themes (p = 0.005), and requests for prayer (p = 0.028). Patients below the retirement age exhibited more needs, including fears (p = 0.019), grief (p = 0.002), and hope (p < 0.001) compared to older patients. Religious affiliation was associated with prayer (p = 0.003) and anointing of the sick (p = 0.036). Psychological services documented spiritual needs in 86.1% of cases (mainly existential and psychological needs), whereas pastoral care (53%) focused on religious themes, including all mentions of sacramental rituals.
conclusionsThis is the first Swiss study to classify spiritual needs based on routine clinical documentation. The findings highlight the prevalence and multidimensionality of spiritual concerns, with psychological needs being most frequently documented, and significant differences observed by age, gender, and religious affiliation. Distinct documentation patterns emerged between psychological and pastoral care, underlining the need for structured assessment tools and interprofessional collaboration. Implementing standardized documentation and training could enhance the visibility and continuity of spiritual care and guide future research and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.