ReviewPediatric rheumatology online journal2026
Enhancing the precision of clinical assessment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis through the JADAS.
Review in Pediatric rheumatology online journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of composite disease activity scores enables a pragmatic approach to the measurement of the level of disease activity in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). These tools are constructed through the combination of individual measures and provide a quantification of the absolute level of disease activity in one summary number on a continuous scale. The first composite score for JIA, named Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS), was published in 2009. It includes the following four variables: physician global assessment, parent/patient global assessment, active joints count, and an acute phase reactant. Its score is calculated as the arithmetic sum of the scores of its four items. Additional versions of the JADAS, which lack the acute phase reactant (clinical JADAS, cJADAS) or are specific to systemic JIA (systemic JADAS, sJADAS), were developed over the years. An important progress in the field has been represented by the definition of the cutoff values in the JADAS that distinguish the states of inactive disease or minimal, moderate, and high disease activity in JIA. These cutoffs may serve as therapeutic targets in the treat-to-target strategy. Recently, a JADAS version entirely composed of parent/patient-reported outcome measures has been developed and validated. This tool is well suited to implement remote patient monitoring, a form of telemedicine that may help to optimize disease control and reduce the pressure on healthcare systems. This review is aimed to describe the different versions of the JADAS and the main aspects of their developmental process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.