Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42092923›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Dry nettle (Urtica dioica) as a feed additive: impacts on duck growth, meat quality, gut morphology, gene expression, and microbiota.

Sebastian Wlaźlak, Konrad Edwartowski, Weronika Krajniak, Zofia Siuta, Natalia Pawlikowska, Nikola Piotrowska, Nikola Śmiłowicz, Konrad Pilarski, Jakub Bielec, Sebastian Knaga and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sebastian WlaźlakDepartment of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland. sebastian.wlazlak@pbs.edu.pl.
Konrad EdwartowskiAVIUM Student Scientific Club, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Weronika KrajniakAVIUM Student Scientific Club, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Zofia SiutaAVIUM Student Scientific Club, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Natalia PawlikowskaAVIUM Student Scientific Club, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Nikola PiotrowskaAVIUM Student Scientific Club, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Nikola ŚmiłowiczAVIUM Student Scientific Club, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Konrad PilarskiDepartment of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Jakub BielecAVIUM Student Scientific Club, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Sebastian KnagaDepartment of Animal Biotechnology and Genetics, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Patrycja ReszkaDepartment of Animal Biotechnology and Genetics, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Iwona ZarembaDepartment of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Aleksandra DunisławskaDepartment of Animal Biotechnology and Genetics, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Mirosław BanaszakDepartment of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Marek AdamskiDepartment of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.
Jakub BiesekDepartment of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland.

Funding

Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki RID/SP/0017/2024/01Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki SKN/SP/602297/2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated the effects of dried nettle (Urtica dioica) supplementation on broiler ducks. A total of 180 Cherry Valley ducks were assigned to three groups: control, 1% nettle, and 3% nettle. Growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, intestinal morphology, digesta viscosity, liver gene expression, and cecal microbiota were assessed. During rearing, the ducks' body weight, growth, feed intake, and conversion ratio were controlled and calculated. After slaughter, carcass composition, meat quality, duodenum and jejunum morphology, liver gene expression, and intestinal microbiota composition were analyzed.

resultsNettle supplementation did not influence body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, European Broiler Index, carcass yield, organ weights, or meat quality parameters. However, notable improvements in intestinal structure were observed, especially in ducks receiving 3% nettle, which showed increased duodenal villus width and surface area, as well as higher jejunal villus height. Digesta viscosity was significantly reduced in the jejunum of the 3% nettle group. Gene expression analysis revealed significant upregulation of CYP7A1 in the 1% nettle group and ALB in the 3% group. Antioxidant-related genes (SOD1 and SOD2) were significantly upregulated, and GPX2 downregulated, only in the 3% nettle group, with no significant changes observed in the 1% group. Although beneficial bacterial populations were unchanged, a marked reduction in Fusobacterium nucleatum was detected in the 3% group, indicating a selective antimicrobial effect.

conclusionsDried nettle at 3% improved gut morphology and antioxidant responses without affecting growth or meat quality, supporting its potential as a functional feed additive.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDucksGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMeatUrtica dioicaAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsGene ExpressionIntestinesLiverMaleGastrointestinal tractHealth statusMeat qualityPhytogenic additiveWaterfowl

Identifiers

PMID42092923
PMCPMC13317411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.