SynthesisBMC health services research2026
Telehealth and healthcare access for individuals with Down syndrome: a systematic review of opportunities and barriers.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with Down syndrome (DS) face significant barriers in accessing healthcare. Telehealth, defined as the delivery of healthcare services through direct clinical interaction using telecommunications technologies such as videoconferencing, telephone, or remote monitoring, has emerged as a potential strategy to improve accessibility and quality of care. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on the impact of telehealth interventions on healthcare access for individuals with DS.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating telehealth interventions for people with DS. Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar) were searched from inception to May 31, 2025. Eligible studies included interventions involving direct remote clinical care (e.g., videoconferencing, telephone, telemonitoring). Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer.
resultsOf 332 records screened after duplicate removal, 53 full-text articles were reviewed and 39 were included. Interventions ranged from teleconsultations to remote monitoring and mobile applications. Findings suggested potential improvements in healthcare access, clinical outcomes, and satisfaction. However, most studies were small in sample size, varied in design, and more than half had a moderate risk of bias.
conclusionsTelehealth shows promise in improving access to healthcare for people with DS, but current evidence is limited by methodological weaknesses and heterogeneity. Future research should focus on larger, high-quality studies to clarify long-term impacts and inform implementation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.