ArticleBMC medical genomics2026
Characterizing core outcomes of responsible stewardship for human genomic data in the cloud.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present findings from a scoping review of the genomic data sharing literature used to inform a core outcomes set for responsible data stewardship in the cloud. Genomic and related health data stemming from government funded research have undergone mass migration to the cloud where they can be more securely stored, accessed, and analyzed within shared computing environments. While this migration reflects a shift in privacy and security infrastructure for cloud-based repositories as oversight becomes more globalized, it also necessitates new data stewardship responsibilities to align authorized data access with ethical data use. Responsible data stewardship refers to the ethical and secure management, use, and protection of data to ensure its accuracy, privacy, integrity, and appropriate access throughout its lifecycle. Practicing responsible data stewardship is therefore one axis by which repositories can demonstrate trustworthiness in their data access and management practices. We searched the cloud governance and data sharing literature indexed in Web of Science as well as Elicit using the scoping review approach by Arksey and O'Mally. A total of 46 articles met our inclusion criteria, to which we applied a deductive, thematic content analysis to generate relevant outcome domains as well as individual core outcomes of cloud-based data. Our qualitative synthesis resulted in 35 individual core outcomes organized under 9 core domains: transparency, authentication, auditing, accountability, security, sustainability, standardization, consent and compliance, and community engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.