ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Development and validation of a computerized adaptive testing for borderline personality disorder.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBorderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by a high prevalence rate, frequent comorbidities, and complex manifestations. The challenges associated with evaluating BPD underscore the need for efficient assessment tools.
methodTo facilitate efficient BPD screening in the general population, this study developed a computerized adaptive test for BPD (CAT-BPD) using a Chinese sample (N = 1,097). The CAT-BPD item bank was constructed from several widely used BPD scales and calibrated using item response theory (IRT). A CAT simulation was subsequently conducted using the empirical response data to evaluate the performance of the item bank.
resultsThe final item bank comprised 71 items. Each retained item assessed at least one BPD symptom criterion and demonstrated local independence, adequate item fit, high discrimination, and an absence of differential item functioning (DIF). Furthermore, the simulation indicated that the CAT-BPD maintained acceptable reliability, criterion-related validity, and predictive utility while substantially reducing the test length.
conclusionsThese findings suggest the CAT-BPD is an efficient tool for BPD screening and can facilitate the early identification of BPD in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.