ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Accurate estimation of hip range of motion using MediaPipe and inertial sensors with machine learning models.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate, objective assessment of hip joint range of motion (ROM) is essential for orthopedic diagnosis and rehabilitation. Conventional tools, such as goniometers, are limited by subjectivity, inter-observer variability, and poor compatibility with telemedicine applications. This study aimed to develop and validate a markerless, video-based system for estimating hip joint ROM by integrating human pose estimation (MediaPipe) with machine-learning models using inertial sensor data as the reference standard. Twenty healthy adult males performed hip flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, and internal/external rotation movements. Skeletal coordinates extracted from the videos were converted into geometric features and used to train five regression models (linear regression, ElasticNet, support vector regression, random forest, and LightGBM). Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R²) and mean absolute error (MAE), and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used to interpret feature contributions. Among the evaluated models, tree-based methods showed high predictive accuracy, and LightGBM was used for subsequent interpretability analyses across all directions of hip ROM (R² up to 0.94; MAE 4-6°), while inertial sensor validation confirmed high measurement accuracy of the reference data. SHAP analysis revealed that distinct geometric descriptors dominated flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, and internal/external rotation, indicating direction-specific biomechanical determinants of hip motion. These findings demonstrate that markerless, video-based estimation of hip ROM is feasible with promising accuracy and highlight the potential of this approach for telemedicine, remote rehabilitation monitoring, and future integration into gait and musculoskeletal modeling workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.