Observational studyBMC public health2026
Clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with return-to-work after upper and lower limb fractures.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFractures of the upper and lower limbs often result in prolonged work absence and significant psychosocial consequences. However, evidence on predictors of return-to-work (RTW) and associated outcomes remains limited. This study aimed to examine return-to-work rates and associated clinical and socioeconomic factors among injured workers in Taiwan with upper or lower limb fractures.
methodsThis was a retrospective observational study of 360 employed adults with a single upper or lower limb fracture treated at a medical center between 2018 and 2020. Participants completed structured questionnaires assessing demographic, clinical, psychological, and occupational variables. The primary outcome was RTW at the original workplace. Logistic regression identified factors associated with failure to RTW, and linear regression assessed its impact on psychological and physical health.
resultsAbout 14% of the 360 participants did not return to their original workplace. Lower limb fractures (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-4.82), working part-time (aOR = 10.09, 95% CI: 4.05-25.12) or temporary employment (aOR = 5.44, 95% CI: 1.80-16.45), prolonged hospitalization, and lower income were independently associated with failure to RTW. Participants unable to RTW reported significantly higher levels of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, perceived injustice, and poorer quality of life compared to those who RTW.
conclusionsBoth clinical and socioeconomic factors substantially influence RTW after limb fractures. Vulnerable workers, particularly those in non-permanent or low-income jobs, require targeted rehabilitation and vocational support to improve reintegration outcomes and mitigate adverse psychosocial effects.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.