SynthesisBMC cancer2026
The impact of advanced glycation end products and their receptors on the development and prognosis of colorectal cancer.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to analyze whether advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and their receptors had an impact on the development and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC).
methodsThis study examined the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases and CNKI up to 7 February 2024 for cohort studies assessing the association between AGEs and their receptors, including receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) on the development and prognosis of CRC.
resultsThe meta-analysis included eight studies with a total of 8,278 participants. It demonstrated that sRAGE expression was significantly lower in CRC patients compared to controls. In contrast, no significant differences were found in the expression levels of RAGE or AGEs between CRC patients and controls. Overall survival was not significantly associated with RAGE expression levels. Subgroup analysis indicated that the inverse association between sRAGE and CRC was significant in the general population but not observed among diabetic patients.
conclusionLow sRAGE expression was associated with an increased risk of CRC development, whereas RAGE and AGEs were not associated with the development and prognosis of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.