ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes reveals molecular evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Styrax (Styracaceae).
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plastome evidence repositionsFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Styrax is the most species-rich and economically important genus within Styracaceae, valued for its medicinal, ornamental, and bioactive properties. Chloroplast genomic resources for this genus remain limited. Here, we conducted comparative genomic analyses of 23 newly assembled chloroplast genomes of Styrax to characterize genome architecture and evolutionary patterns, and performed phylogenetic analyses using broader sampling across the genus to resolve infrageneric relationships. All genomes exhibited a typical quadripartite structure with highly conserved IR/SC boundaries and core genes involved in photosynthesis and replication. Six tandem repeat sequences were identified. Codon usage bias indicated a preference for A/U endings, reflecting the interplay of mutation bias and moderate selection. Phylogenetic analyses recovered two well-supported monophyletic clades and revealed that the two sections (Sect. Valvatae and Sect. Styrax) are not monophyletic, whereas all four series recognized by Fritsch (Ser. Styrax, Ser. Valvatae, Ser. Cyrta, and Ser. Benzoin) were recovered as monophyletic. These findings enrich Styracaceae genomic resources, clarify infrageneric relationships, and provide a foundation for DNA barcoding and adaptive evolution studies in Styrax.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.