ArticleBMC neurology2026
Galeal scoring for salvage scalp closure following cranioplasty failure: a case report.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAchieving tension-free scalp closure after decompressive craniectomy or cranioplasty can be quite demanding, especially in patients who have developed fibrosis or infection from previous procedures. In such situations, galeal scoring (galeotomies) can improve scalp mobility. Although this technique is well known in plastic surgery, it is not commonly reported in neurosurgical work. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old man sustained a high-velocity head injury that produced a large right fronto-parietal acute subdural hematoma with marked midline shift. He underwent an emergency decompressive craniectomy, leaving the bone flap off. After recovery, a delayed cranioplasty was performed using a custom implant, but the wound later became infected, requiring removal of the prosthesis and repeated debridement. As a result, the scalp contracted, and primary closure became difficult. During the final reconstruction, several small galeal-relaxing cuts were made to relieve tension and allow a comfortable closure. OUTCOME: The wound healed completely without further infection. At six months, the patient remained neurologically stable with a satisfactory cosmetic appearance.
conclusionGaleal scoring offers a simple, inexpensive, and safe way to gain additional scalp mobility when closure is tight. It can often prevent the need for complex flap or graft procedures and is worth considering in similar neurosurgical cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.