ArticleJournal of vascular surgery2026
Utilization of the stop-short technique in transcarotid artery revascularization is associated with intraoperative common carotid artery dissection.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTranscarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has gained widespread adoption for carotid revascularization since the US Food and Drug Administration approved it for use in 2015. Intraoperative common carotid artery (CCA) dissection during the procedure remains a feared complication. However, data describing CCA dissection incidence and ways to mitigate it remain limited. We analyzed a contemporary, manufacturer-maintained registry to determine the incidence, risk factors, management strategies, and clinical outcomes of CCA dissection during TCAR.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the Silk Road Medical registry, which included all TCAR procedures performed between January 2023 and January 2024. We identified cases of CCA dissection, recorded the procedural step during which they occurred, and reviewed management strategies and perioperative acute stroke events. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify patient and procedural characteristics associated with CCA dissection and compared procedural metrics between patients with vs without CCA dissection.
resultsOf 25,346 patients undergoing TCAR (median age, 74 years; 61.9 % male), 300 (1.18%) experienced a CCA dissection. CCA dissections occurred most commonly during arterial sheath insertion (61.7%), followed by micropuncture access (21.7%) and guidewire manipulation (12.0%). Surgeons managed dissections with additional stent deployment (41.0%), conversion to carotid endarterectomy (22.0%), or other open surgical repairs (6.7%). Acute stroke events occurred in 2.3% of patients with CCA dissection (7/300). After risk adjustment, factors associated with CCA dissection included age ≥85 years (vs <65 years; adjusted odd ratio [aOR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-3.02), female sex (aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.31-2.07), and use of the stop-short technique (ie, maintaining the stiff guidewire within the CCA during sheath insertion instead of advancing to the external carotid artery [aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.70-3.02]). Patients with CCA dissection had longer procedure times, greater fluoroscopy exposure, higher contrast use, and more frequent use of two or more stents compared to patients without CCA dissection (all P < .001).
conclusionsTCAR demonstrates a favorable safety profile, with a low incidence of intraoperative CCA dissection. Use of the stop-short technique was associated with a two-fold increase in the risk of CCA dissection. Surgeons should engage the external carotid artery during sheath insertion whenever possible to minimize the risk of CCA dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.