ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026
Individual variability in neural correlates of visual engagement in premature toddlers.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prematurity disrupts in-utero processes that support neurocognitive development, with children born preterm at increased risk for long-term difficulties. Little is known about how prematurity affects early development of neural systems supporting visual engagement, or whether early variability in engagement relates to later attention outcomes. The present study examined behavioral and neural correlates of visual engagement in toddlers born prematurely using a developmentally appropriate computerized attention paradigm, involving attention capturing stimuli varying in duration, location, and motion while EEG was recorded. Visual engagement based on looking time and alpha power, a neural marker of cortical activation modulated by visual attention, were quantified in response to task stimuli and a resting baseline. Toddlers whose parents reported higher education levels showed greater overall looking time to visual stimuli. There was not a significant effect of gestational status on this behavioral response. In contrast, gestational status was associated with greater alpha power during rest relative to visual engagement. Toddlers born closer to term showed a larger rest-engagement difference in alpha power, whereas toddlers born at earlier gestational ages showed a smaller difference driven by lower resting alpha. This pattern in earlier-born toddlers may reflect delayed or disrupted maturation of this neural signature and may represent a neural substrate of prospective attention difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.