Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42092334›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026

Carbon Footprint of Antibody-Based Drugs and Biologics Using Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment.

Sébastien Taillemite, Martin Fenelon, Marc Scherlinger, Max Piffoux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sébastien TaillemiteEcovamed, Paris, France.ORCID 0009-0008-7211-840X
Martin FenelonEcovamed, Paris, France.
Marc ScherlingerRheumatology Department, National Reference Center for Rare Autoimmune Systemic Diseases, RESO, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9453-5895
Max PiffouxMedical Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7806-101X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological engineering has emerged since the 1980s as one of the most efficient technologies to develop new medicines. The monoclonal antibody platform is the most widely used, representing about 15-20% of drug sales. Only scarce and partial monoclonal antibody life cycle assessments (LCAs) are reported. We estimate the cradle-to-pharmacy gate carbon footprint of monoclonal antibodies from the pharmacopeia on the market (n = 103) using the full life cycle inventory of the medicines, encompassing antibody production, packaging production, transport, medicine manufacturing, and associated corporate emissions using a hybrid LCA/environmentally extended input-output model. Monoclonal antibody-based drugs have an important carbon footprint with a mean of 169.7 kgCO

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBiological ProductsCarbon FootprintHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID42092334
PMCPMC13264457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.