Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42092293›Full record

Trial reportAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2026

Rifaximin Improves Cognitive Performance and Reduces Cirrhosis-Related Adverse Events in Covert Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hiroki Inada, Toshinori Toyota, Haruki Uojima, Etsuko Iio, Takao Miwa, Satoshi Miuma, Shiho Miyase, Takahiro Mizuta, Daiki Maeda, Katsuya Nagaoka and 12 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Hiroki InadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3456-6921
Toshinori ToyotaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Haruki UojimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Etsuko IioDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Takao MiwaDepartment of Gastroenterology/Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6373-260X
Satoshi MiumaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Shiho MiyaseDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Takahiro MizutaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Daiki MaedaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Katsuya NagaokaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Satoshi NaraharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8647-9486
Sotaro KuranoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kentaro TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yoko YoshimaruDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Takehisa WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Shuichiro IwasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Hisashi HidakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-5663
Kazuhiro SugiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hiroko SetoyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7955-1806
Masahito ShimizuDepartment of Gastroenterology/Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1151-2058
Jiro NakayamaDepartment of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yasuhito TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2473-6966

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP24fk0210103Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP25fk0210172Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP24K18908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCovert hepatic encephalopathy (CHE) is associated with cognitive impairment and adverse clinical outcomes; however, randomized evidence supporting therapeutic intervention remains limited.

aimTo evaluate the efficacy of rifaximin (RFX) as a treatment for CHE.

methodsIn this multicentre, open-label randomized controlled trial, patients with CHE associated with liver cirrhosis were randomized (1:1) to receive RFX or no treatment and followed for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in Stroop test performance. Secondary endpoints included NCT-B scores, serum ammonia levels, cirrhosis-related adverse events, and gut microbiota composition.

resultsFifty patients were randomized and completed follow-up. Stroop test performance improved significantly in the RFX group (p = 0.006) but not in controls (p = 0.400), with a trend toward greater improvement with RFX (Δ Stroop test: -4.45 ± 7.12 vs. -0.98 ± 5.74 s; p = 0.056). Among patients not receiving synthetic disaccharides at baseline, improvement was significantly greater with RFX (Δ Stroop test: -3.73 ± 5.96 vs. -0.80 ± 5.86 s; p = 0.049). No significant changes were observed in NCT-B scores or serum ammonia levels. Cirrhosis-related adverse events were significantly reduced in the RFX group (p = 0.006). Overall, gut microbial diversity did not differ between groups; however, RFX selectively altered specific taxa, including loss of the [Eubacterium] brachy group.

conclusionsRFX improved cognitive performance assessed by the Stroop test and reduced cirrhosis-related adverse events in patients with CHE. These randomized data support RFX as an effective therapeutic option and highlight the Stroop test as a sensitive endpoint for treatment response.

Indexed as

CognitionCognition DisordersGastrointestinal AgentsHepatic EncephalopathyLiver CirrhosisRifamycinsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRifaximinStroop TestTreatment OutcomeGastrointestinal AgentsRifamycinsRifaximincovert hepatic encephalopathy (CHE)gut microbiotaliver cirrhosis (LC)minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE)rifaximin (RFX)stroop test

Identifiers

PMID42092293
PMCPMC13356396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.