ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2026
Spatial-quantitative profiling of intrahepatic HBsAg heterogeneity and clustered distribution in chronic HBV infection.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsHepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), a hallmark of chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB) infection, is expressed from both covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and integrated HBV DNA. HBsAg exhibits diffuse, scattered, or clustered intrahepatic patterns, yet their variation across disease phases and the relationship to HBV DNA remain unclear.
methodsFormalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections from 385 treatment-naive patients with CHB were analyzed. The immunofluorescence and enhanced in situ hybridization (IF-ISH) assay was coupled with a whole-slide imaging-based quantitative pipeline to delineate the spatial patterns of HBsAg in the context of viral DNA. Laser capture microdissection isolated HBsAg-positive hepatocytes, followed by HBV-enriched Nanopore sequencing and SMART-seq2 based RNA sequencing.
resultsHBeAg-negative individuals showed more clustered HBsAg-positive hepatocytes than HBeAg-positive individuals (55.1% vs. 34.5%). IF-ISH analysis with enhanced sensitivity for HBV DNA confirmed the general mutually exclusive pattern between HBsAg-rich and HBV DNA-positive hepatocytes, while also revealing a subset of colocalization events, together with phase-specific variations in the subcellular (nuclear vs. cytoplasmic) localization of viral DNA. Clustered HBsAg-rich hepatocytes predominantly exhibited cytoplasmic HBV DNA in patients who were HBeAg-positive (54.4%), whereas nuclear HBV DNA was dominant in patients who were HBeAg-negative (78.8%), harboring transcripts derived from integrant and/or cccDNA.
conclusionsThis study provides quantitative evidence that clustered HBsAg-rich hepatocytes are more prevalent in individuals who are HBeAg-negative and predominantly harbor nuclear-localized HBV DNA originating from integration and/or cccDNA, thereby providing new insights into phase-specific intrahepatic viral heterogeneity and advancing understanding of host-virus interactions in HBV persistence. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: This study reveals that clustered HBsAg-positive hepatocytes, enriched in individuals who are HBeAg-negative, predominantly contain nuclear HBV DNA originating from integration and/or cccDNA. The mutually exclusive spatial patterns of HBsAg-rich and HBV DNA-positive hepatocytes reflect distinct viral reservoirs and dynamic changes across different phases of chronic HBV infection. These findings provide new insights into the intrahepatic landscape of HBV persistence and may inform phase-specific strategies for functional cure of chronic hepatitis B.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.