ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2026
Understanding Responsible Antimicrobial Practices and Antimicrobial Resistance: A Cross-Sectional Study of Farmers in Rangpur, Bangladesh.
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global health threat, intensified in low- and middle-income countries by rampant antibiotic misuse in livestock and poultry. This study assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of 537 farmers in Rangpur, Bangladesh, to identify drivers and pathways of high-risk antimicrobial use (AMU). Data on demographics, farm characteristics, and AMR-related KAP scores were collected, with disease treatments mapped to WHO AWaRe classifications. Logistic regression identified predictors of responsible practices, while additional analyses and visualizations explored patterns of antimicrobial use and misuse pathways. Results showed that 42.9% of antibiotic use was high-risk, with nearly half of diseases treated using Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIAs) from the Watch or Reserve groups, intended primarily for human medicine. Colistin and ciprofloxacin, last-resort drugs for human health, were commonly used for routine poultry diseases, raising serious public health concerns. Three misuse pathways emerged: (i) antibiotics applied to viral diseases, (ii) reliance on Watch/Reserve antibiotics for bacterial infections, and (iii) antibiotic use for parasitic diseases. Paravets and veterinarians influenced 76.2% of prescribing decisions, underscoring their pivotal role. AMR training was associated with more responsible practices, yet high practice scores did not consistently align with knowledge or attitudes, revealing a gap between behavior and awareness. Immediate One Health stewardship interventions combining regulatory enforcement, improved diagnostics, and sweeping educational reform are essential to reduce AMR risks and safeguard public health in Bangladesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.