ArticleCommunications engineering2026
Optimized sensor-embedded loose garment for accurate motion detection.
Article in Communications engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wearable technology has become increasingly important for health monitoring, sports performance, and ergonomic assessments because it enables continuous, non-invasive, and real-time tracking of physiological and biomechanical signals in real-world environments, overcoming limitations of laboratory-based assessments. This paper presents the development, testing, and initial study of a sensor-embedded loose garment designed for motion analysis using conductive ink. Sensors were strategically placed across key areas of the T-shirt to capture comprehensive motion data from the torso. Positioned on the chest, shoulders, ribcage, and lower torso, these sensors detect detailed movements. The study evaluates various sensor combinations with four classifiers-XGBoost, RandomForest, SVM, and K-Nearest Neighbors-using data from ten sensor locations analyzed with three holdout methods (20-80%, 30-70%, and 50-50%). Results underscore the impact of specific sensor placements, with combinations on the shoulder, ribcage, and abdomen yielding the highest accuracy. This work advances textile-based motion recognition, showing the potential for wearable technology to distinguish among eight movements in a loose garment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.